Grape Poisoning- What in the World???
I find this topic fascinating. The first time I heard
this reported, I said "What???" just like the rest of you. "I have been feeding my dogs grapes for years without incidence"
I said. "Why would something that has so many health benefits in people (minus the pesticide residues) cause so much trouble
in dogs?" I guess many would leave that question unanswered or be content with the list of possible explanations and simply
stop feeding grapes to dogs. Buuuut, after 5 years of pretty intense medical research, studying everything from Alzheimer's
to Zinc deficiency, I had to give it my best shot.
And here it is- First of all, what do we know? Hmmm... We know that
there have been very few reported cases. There have probably been more but were just written off as something else like antifreeze
intoxication or immune glomerulonephritis (more on that in a minute). We also know that the dose of the raisins or grapes
ranged from a large quantity to a quite small amount. This is a big key. This makes poisoning very unlikely. And if it were
a poison, they would have been able to ID this most likely. Plus, most pesticides affect the liver not the kidneys. The KIDNEYS
are the target organ- another key fact.
What is one of the most common causes of death of (older) dogs and cats? Kidney
failure. What is the most common cause of kidney failure? (Chronic) immune glomerulonephritis. What is the cause of immune
glomerulonephritis? Ahhh, now there is where it gets interesting. Most would say that it is "idiopathic" (just like we have
to label his grape thing as being right now, interestingly.). Unfortunately, the consensus of opinion is that this "idiopathic"
form of kidney failure is an "autoimmune" disorder, in which the immune system goes "haywire" and attacks the body's tissues
for no reason. "Its a genetic thing" is what is often said.
I contend that the body does not make that kind of "mistake"...ever.
The immune system never attacks the body "for no reason". There is something IN that tissue that it doesn't like...some foreign
protein that has taken up residence in that tissue. What would be there? The usual suspects...viruses, mycoplasma, food proteins
(lectins- http://www.krispin.com/lectin.html ), bacteria, yeast, and others. Actually, This has been suspected to be the case
Viruses are KNOWN to inhabit many of our tissues, laying dormant for years, sometimes lifetimes, just waiting
for their opportunity to pop up and cause trouble. Great examples are Herpes, shingles, and even AIDS (How long has Magic
Johnson been HIV positive now?). Many cancers are known to be viral now. When did we acquire these guys? Could some of them
have been there since birth, even transmitted from mother to offspring? We know that this happens, too. Could this explain
"genetic" cancers? Why do so many immune-related disorders have remitting/relapsing symptoms? Sounds sort of like a Herpes
virus infection, doesn't it?
Did you know that plants contain viruses? Have you looked into what GMO's really are?
The fact is that viruses are ubiquitous in nature. A single teaspoon of sea water contains over a billion
viruses. Viruses are ESSENTIAL in nature, being responsible for adaptation by living things and variation in nature. Viruses
mutate and adapt. (Do genes really mutate??? Great question. We know something that does for sure, don't we? Do viruses ever
incorporate their genetic material into ours? Of course. That IS what they do.)
In the cat, there is a viral condition
known as FIP. What an interesting condition. It starts with the cat contracting the FIP virus (a corona virus). The infection
is usually either inapparent or a mild upper respiratory infection that the cat quickly suppresses. BUT, the virus sometimes
disseminates (spreads) throughout the body, setting up housekeeping in various tissues (liver, kidneys, brain, eyes, lining
of the chest/abdomen, etc). THEN, upon subsequent exposure to the virus again... OR an FIP-LIKE virus (very important here!!!)...the
immune response to the new virus spills over into the tissue where the original virus is located and the immune system attacks
that tissue with the old virus in it. This is the KNOWN mechanism for FIP, with the symtoms arising from the immune response
to the virus in the tissue and the subsequent death of some of that tissue. Wow! What a great example of "autoimmunity". Sounds
sort of like "friendly fire", doesn't it?
So you probably see where I am going with this now. WHAT IF the grapes raisins
contain a VIRUS...a plant virus...that is similar to the one already in the kidneys of the dog that eats those grapes/raisins?
Afterall, many dogs are bound to have viruses in their kidneys already. (Researchers KNOW they are there, just as they are
in the brain, liver, and other tissues.) And we now know from conditions like FIP that one of the mechanisms of immune-mediated
disease is re-exposure to a virus (or vaccine. Oh oh, again) with the cascade of events described above taking place.
I could easily believe that the grape "poisoning" is an acute, immune-mediated reaction to a plant virus that resembles one
already in the kidney of the affected dog. That would explain much, wouldn't it? It would explain the low incidence, the low
dose of grapes/raisins required, the rapid course (how long does it take to have an immune response to something?), and the
fact that all tests have failed to identify the culprit. Viruses can be hard to identify and isolate, can't they? If they
weren't , we would have a much better handle on our "idiopathic" immune-mediated diseases for one thing.
Why do I find
this "fascinating"? Because I see the real danger in GMO's as do many knowledgeable scientists. And they are doing some crazy
things with new genetics technology, crossing deep water halibut genes with tomatoes to make them last longer in the refrigerator.
It is a sort of "Island of Dr. Moreaux" sort of thing. (You may need to look that one up. :) ) As I tell people, "Hey,I saw
Alien 3-The Resurrection. I know how sci-fi experiments can go very badly". When did we think we could mess with Nature this
Food for thought, eh?
My study of fluoride revealed that grapes and raisins are incredibly
high in this potentially toxic element. Could the high fluoride content of grapes and their wrinkled siblings be the cause
of the kidney failure in dogs that ingest them? If so, what is the true mechanism for that renal failure? What
makes something "toxic" to one individual and not to another?
These are the kinds of questions I have started asking while trying to uncover
the truth about medicine. We have taken a lot for granted or at least been satisfied with rather superficial explanations
for some medical occurrences. Toxicity is one such topic. "Hey, it's toxic. What more do you need to know?" one might ask.
Well, the study of autism and the attempts made to unravel the true causes
versus the triggers has put me into a diagnostic mode that I never used to employ. Questions like "If the vaccines
are the cause of autism, then why don't all individuals who receive the vaccine develop autism?" are great examples of very
valid questions with surprisingly good answers. As it turns out, vaccines are both causes and triggers depending on which
element of the vaccine being discussed but there are deeper factors (e.g. food intolerance) that have set the autistic child
up for this horrific reaction to a vaccine that is tossed off by the "normal" child. Some of today's children- the offspring
of the fast food generation- are simply too unhealthy to take on a vaccine loaded with man-engineered modified live viruses,
adjuvants and mercury (thimersol).
I believe the same is true with the reaction to fluoride. Fluoride is a highly
toxic, cumulative toxin- similar to mercury in those regards. Fluoride is a known carcinogen and trigger of "autoimmune disease".
Now that we better understand the role of viruses and intracellular bacteria in these processes, we should be able to imagine how fluoride could serve to stimulate these hidden entities into
In cancer, we have to have three things come together to produce the undesirable
outcome: The viruses that cause cancer, the carcinogens that cause the viruses to cause cancer, and some degree of immune
failure that allows the process to get out of control. We all have viruses in our body that are capable of causing cancer.
and we all are being bombarded by carcinogens through our diet and environments. So, why do we now all develop cancer early
in life? Because we have not yet exceeded the tolerance level of that particular tissue (I contend, set by the intracellular
viruses and bacteria within that cell) and, up to that point, we have a healthy immune system that is keeping that cell
from growing out of control even when that tolerance level is exceeded. But, exceed that threshold and damage
your immune system...look out.
It is clear that our body hates mercury and fluoride, two of the most toxic
elements known to man. But what, again, determines when an individual will suffer a toxic reaction and what the manifestation
will be? Certainly, the reaction is greatly dose dependent. We have established the LD50 (lethal dose) for many such chemicals
but even then, that designation is the median toxic dose and the amount required to kill 50% of the exposed population.
If it kills 50%, why does it not kill the others? To me, that is a most interesting question and the crux of the matter.
Some individuals are more tolerant of toxic insults than others. What determines
this tolerance- "genetics", luck, or defined entities within the cells? Why does an individual's tolerance for allergens typically
go down over time, resulting in their becoming "horribly allergic" to something such as cat dander or pollens?
The cool thing to see is that there are living organisms residing in our cells-
viruses and intracellular bacteria- whose main characteristic is their ability to adapt. And, they are in
our cells to help that tissue adapt. Many of the symptoms we experience is that adaptive process. And as the saying goes,
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." How does one develop a tolerance for drugs, alcohol and even toxins (e.g. rattlesnake
venom)? Through gradual exposure and adaptation.
As I've discussed in other papers, cancer is the ultimate adaption of viruses
and intracellular bacteria. These two entities work in concert to decide when it is time for the cell to divide, how rapidly
it will divide and what that cell will turn into. We also know that cancer is the "end game" of autoimmune diseases", meaning
that cancer arises in areas of chronic inflammation and that most cancer is preceded by some manifestation of long-term immune-mediated
We have known for years that cancer is viral. We have just come to grips with
the role of intracellular bacteria in cancer, as they exchange their nuclear material with that of the mitochondria of the
cell. And we are finally seeing the role that both of these tiny entities play in "autoimmune" diseases. Many individuals
with the latter are being helped with specific antibiotics such as doxycycline, minocycline, and azithromycin known for
their ability to control mycoplasma and L-form bacteria.
But, there is another group of drugs that also kills these particular
bacteria called the fluoroquinolones (Levaquin, Baytril, Zeniquin). These are fluoride-based antibiotics,
with fluoride being a powerful antibacterial. But, when you look up the side effects of these fluoroquinolones, they read
like a who's who of autoimmune diseases, similar to the old sulfur-based drugs to which many are intolerant. In fact, there
are Websites out there that are determined to have fluoroquinolones banned from the shelves due to the havoc these drugs wreaked
on them or a family member.
How can a drug that kills bacteria so effectively in some individuals cause
such serious "autoimmune disease" (which involves viruses and bacteria) in others? Uh, "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger"???
I can easily see how the internal residents of the cell could react violently to the presence of the fluoride (or sulfur).
After all, those bacteria living inside the cell are not killed by the antibiotic. Only those outside
the cell are killed. And those mycoplasma that are killed quickly by an antibiotic
can release a toxin that results in a major reaction called the Herxheimer Reaction, that can generate a myriad of symptoms.
So, what are the chances that the fluoride in the grapes and
raisins are actually stimulating a reaction by viruses and/or intracellular bacteria inside the cells of the kidney
of those who ingest them? Could that be the true origin of this uncommon reaction to eating grapes and raisins? Is it
a "perfect storm" situation like the autism epidemic in which multiple factors have to come together in order to produce the
negative effect? Does one have to occupied by the right (or wrong) microorganisms in order the have a toxic reaction?
Did the fluoride (and/or plant viruses) that the grapes and raisins contained simply push those individuals over the edge,
causing them to have the renal failure that they were destined to have later done the road?
I don't have the definitive answers to all of these questions but at least I
have you thinking, right?
I hope you enjoyed your time here and got something important from your stay. It is
my goal to help all of mankind navigate through the jungle of medical information now available on the Internet and find the
truth about the origins of what we call "disease" as well as discover the natural solutions for these conditions.
We do have our health's destiny in our own hands more than we've ever
imagined, certainly more than most have ever been told. Think naturally and the answer will come.
Click here to go back to the Site Map to read more related articles on Dogtorj.com.
Become a member of the Friends of DogtorJ Email Club !
You can now go to the new site!
The New DogtorJ.com is done! Yes, the time has finally come for this homemade Website to go the way of the
buffalo. I know that you all join me in looking forward to using a site that is better organized and more accessible....prettier,
too! I've even corrected most of those annoying typos (I hope).
Feel free to check it out now at www.dogtorj.com. I am still working hard to populate all of the pages so don't worry if a link does not work. They should
all be active in the near future. In the meantime,
this current site will remain on-line until I get all of the bugs worked out.
Let me know what you think! It's not too late to make some changes.
I would still like to hear
from you personally, though.
I used to have a nice little form in this space that would
allow readers to send me a quick comment or testimonial. Unfortunately, as the Interent goes, I started getting
50-100 junk emails through this form and had to remove it.
So, until the new Website is up and running (soon!), I will have
to ask people to formulate an Email of their own and send it. I do want to hear from you so I would really appreciate
it if you could take the time to do this.
Simply title your Email "Visitor Comment" and include your name, occupation, comment/testimonial and
return Email address (if you want to be contacted) and send it to:
dogtorj @ dogtorj.com (Just remove the spaces on each side of the @ sign)
Please do not use this form to ask medical questions. See
the Contact section for instructions for sending DogtorJ an Email inquiry concerning a medical
be getting a major facelift in the very near future. Yes, the time has finally come for this homemade Website
to be taken over by someone who actually knows what they are doing. I know that you all join me in looking forward to having
the site better organized and more accessible. It'll be prettier, too!
This is taking place for a number of reasons, the most of important
of which will be revealed in the upcoming months. Yes, the book is finally in the works but there will be a
major awareness project to go along with it.
So, please stay tuned. Anyone who would like to get on my mailing list can do so by simply using the visitor's comment area (like the one above)
found at the bottom of each page.
Onward and upward!